Ancelotti - the right man for the Bridge?

"Carlo was the outstanding candidate for the job. He has proved over a long period his ability to build teams that challenged for, and have been successful in, major domestic and European competitions.

"He also had a highly successful playing career in those competitions and therefore brings unparalleled all round experience to the job," the statement added.

SO TRUMPETS the official Chelse FC website this morning - but are they, and Roman Abramovich, right? Or is it another desperate fumbling about in the dark by a board that has not exactly covered itself in glory since the departure of the Special One?

Avram Grant - not good enough - Luiz Felipe Scolari - not backed financially or emotionally - Guus Hiddink - excellent but short termist.

And so to Pilsbury Dough man Ancelotti. I am not confident he is the right man. He has not even won the Italian league title since 2004 - FIVE YEARS - and if he was that good Milan would have hardly let him go, would they? After all, he admitted he would have stayed if they asked him...

He does not speak good English and his last Milan side was like the Real Madrid of the Galacticos era - good on paper, but ageing and fragile on the field. Also, judging by his comments in his autobiog he seems to believe that his mission at Chelsea is to instil 'personality' into the team. How is that going to go down with some of the strongest personalities in the game - Terry, Lampard, Ballack and Drogba among them.

No, surely it would have been more sensible to have allowed Hiddink to stay on in his temporary role - managing both Chelsea and Russia - until the 2010 World Cup finals are over? Then he could have become permanent Chelsea boss. Now, the club risk losing him for ever - hey, he might even end up at Man Utd or Arsenal when his Russian sojourn finall ends!